|
KMID : 0861420120160010003
|
|
Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
2012 Volume.16 No. 1 p.3 ~ p.7
|
|
|
The Comparison of Image Quality Using Body Contour and Circular Method with L-mode in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
|
|
Kim Sung-Hwan
Nam Ki-Pyo
Ryu Jae-Kwang
Yoon Soon-Sang
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: In myocardial perfusion SPECT, the type of orbit (circular vs. body contouring) that affect the image quality is still on the debate. Presently in the nuclear medicine field, the body contouring orbit acquisition is widely used to improve the image quality on the myocardial perfusion SPECT. But in case of body contouring acquisition using the vertical method with dual detect machine, there is a tendency of increasing the radius. In this research, we compared body contouring orbit acquisition with circular orbit acquisition, so we suggest ideal method that reduces the radius for improving image quality.
Materials and Methods: Phantom and clinical studies were performed. The anthropomorphic torso phantom was made on equally with counts from patient’s body. The study was performed under six different conditions. To compare image quality according to the radius, we increased radius sequentially per step during circular orbit acquisition. On the other hand, sensors that protect a collision and reduce the radius automatically were used to acquire image during body contouring orbit acquisition. So we compared FWHM value of apex. In clinical studies, we analyzed the 40 patients who were examined by Tl-201 gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in department of nuclear medicine at Asan Medical Center in August 2011. To acknowledge the differences according to the radius, we acquired the results two times using circular orbit acquisition and body contouring orbit acquisition.
Results: In phantom study, we analyzed that increase of radius resulted in changes of FWHM value. It was 5.41, 6.24, 6.33, 6.42, 6.93 mm. On the other hand, using the body contouring orbit acquisition, FWHM value was 6.23 mm. In clinical study, difference of average radius between two methods was 2.5 cm (circular orbit acquisition was more close to patients).
Conclusion: Through the experiments using Anthropomorphic torso phantom and patients data, we found that FWHM value of circular orbit acquisition was lower than body contouring orbit acquisition. As a result, if the difference of average radius exists approximately 3 cm, circular orbit type acquisition is better than body contouring type acquisition. But clinical investigation is only aimed to average radius, so it needs more investigation in comparison of patient’s image.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Circular orbit acquisition, Body contouring orbit acquisition, Myocardial perfusion SPECT
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|